Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 20:33:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 851C65EE65441529658B3FCB290F6141F3451CC8E968E53AB289B74E400FC5DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes not needed — no evidence has been offered to contradict the hacking claim, and "ETFs have since been approved" is not a reason for a CN: in fact, "it was correct when shared, but is out of date now" is a reason why a post might *not* be misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745892778201038906
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 851C65EE65441529658B3FCB290F6141F3451CC8E968E53AB289B74E400FC5DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1705091631612
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745892778201038906851C65EE65441529658B3FCB290F6141F3451CC8E968E53AB289B74E400FC5DE