Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 18:25:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC3A658C3549485688E3B2661F7C509837409D6255E1B600E6E5397E387A8C4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Not only is the proposed note flat out incorrect (see other NNN) but OP isn’t even claiming it outright. OP refers to experts that have given them their professional opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745832366763807093
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC3A658C3549485688E3B2661F7C509837409D6255E1B600E6E5397E387A8C4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1705170358426
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745832366763807093DC3A658C3549485688E3B2661F7C509837409D6255E1B600E6E5397E387A8C4B