Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 08:45:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F48B063720BEEC290D7A1D2A5D56F7B4AD377EB84D6B0A68D93BB44546A4C2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This headline is misleading, as it ignores streaming numbers. The debate actually pulled in over six million viewers. https://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2024/01/11/cnn-iowa-debate-2024-ratings-streaming-max/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745612310272442442
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F48B063720BEEC290D7A1D2A5D56F7B4AD377EB84D6B0A68D93BB44546A4C2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1705135520260
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17456123102724424423F48B063720BEEC290D7A1D2A5D56F7B4AD377EB84D6B0A68D93BB44546A4C2F