Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 02:24:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6C4468A4C68725E340171FE1C5C9BCFFDADC1B6CE531DB1AEB05617E3139E3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post states the congressman’s interpretation of the constitution. An interpretation that is not out of line with many constitutional scholars. This is clear from the link in the proposed cn. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745605702523945471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6C4468A4C68725E340171FE1C5C9BCFFDADC1B6CE531DB1AEB05617E3139E3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1705026298849
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745605702523945471A6C4468A4C68725E340171FE1C5C9BCFFDADC1B6CE531DB1AEB05617E3139E3F