Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 00:49:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8192FA04E299CD16CF98978E54464CABD4DA6C6F44D97A9F5B5A9391E5F59E98
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post states the congressman’s interpretation of the constitution. An interpretation that is not out of line with many constitutional scholars. This is clear from the link in the proposed cn. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745605702523945471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8192FA04E299CD16CF98978E54464CABD4DA6C6F44D97A9F5B5A9391E5F59E98
  • createdAtMillis - 1705020567389
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17456057025239454718192FA04E299CD16CF98978E54464CABD4DA6C6F44D97A9F5B5A9391E5F59E98