Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 02:54:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36AC3B45EF89299540D49D8F9AFFE8939ABB606E24F3E1FCA0C6502921968321
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post states the congressman’s interpretation of the constitution. An interpretation that is not out of line with many constitutional scholars. This is clear from the link in the proposed cn. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745605702523945471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36AC3B45EF89299540D49D8F9AFFE8939ABB606E24F3E1FCA0C6502921968321
  • createdAtMillis - 1705028070326
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174560570252394547136AC3B45EF89299540D49D8F9AFFE8939ABB606E24F3E1FCA0C6502921968321