Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 06:15:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29095A293D692A99375C2470792320B6E1AC3033CEDF23C09E350A33BE270BFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post states the congressman’s interpretation of the constitution. An interpretation that is not out of line with many constitutional scholars. This is clear from the link in the proposed cn. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745605702523945471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29095A293D692A99375C2470792320B6E1AC3033CEDF23C09E350A33BE270BFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1705040108464
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174560570252394547129095A293D692A99375C2470792320B6E1AC3033CEDF23C09E350A33BE270BFA