Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 03:38:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2711D3F5E5A5BE77300960D3607FBB926A9A14AF841670CE956E000A9F1BBF98
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post states the congressman’s interpretation of the constitution. An interpretation that is not out of line with many constitutional scholars. This is clear from the link in the proposed cn. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745605702523945471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2711D3F5E5A5BE77300960D3607FBB926A9A14AF841670CE956E000A9F1BBF98
  • createdAtMillis - 1705030731796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17456057025239454712711D3F5E5A5BE77300960D3607FBB926A9A14AF841670CE956E000A9F1BBF98