Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 03:49:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7BC16898E60A18E4A96B1948748CCD796E6DE670E6167C0D82146203497050D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Claramente está diciendo eso, C5N DECIA que iba a ser ese número como periodistas son completamente responsables de los datos que usan para contrastar lo que trasmiten a su audiencia. El post original está dando una opinion basada en un hecho, no está siendo engañoso.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745587168033087749
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7BC16898E60A18E4A96B1948748CCD796E6DE670E6167C0D82146203497050D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1705031374692
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17455871680330877497BC16898E60A18E4A96B1948748CCD796E6DE670E6167C0D82146203497050D9