Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 08:25:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81E65B6A28EEF392C99E6F69D342F56DD07C148884234A82D68193A46621E502
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Two word for word duplicate CNs from two different people doesn't make your framing valid. The headline accurately expresses what a watchdog states, that you don't like the implication of it is your problem to take up in replies, not CNs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745577306502860868
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 81E65B6A28EEF392C99E6F69D342F56DD07C148884234A82D68193A46621E502
  • createdAtMillis - 1705134347059
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174557730650286086881E65B6A28EEF392C99E6F69D342F56DD07C148884234A82D68193A46621E502