Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 01:05:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4517224DE6B504C79C198D4388BA1727F707B2B31A49EF9C87B328D9DB12936F
Participant Details

Original Note:

El caso que menciona el autor del post ocurrió entre 2013–2016, donde se resolvió una disputa civil sobre el pago de un premio y no sobre la existencia, per se, del virus del sarampión—contrario a múltiples entradas en redes sociales afirmando que se declaró como inexistente https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N3721SR/ https://africacheck.org/fact-checks/meta-programme-fact-checks/no-german-supreme-court-didnt-rule-measles-doesnt-exist

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745573061825531932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4517224DE6B504C79C198D4388BA1727F707B2B31A49EF9C87B328D9DB12936F
  • createdAtMillis - 1705021529296
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17455730618255319324517224DE6B504C79C198D4388BA1727F707B2B31A49EF9C87B328D9DB12936F