Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 08:35:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F6EA5A05F5EBFF9C0DE74AF9E105D4CA3AC220A8D75C567F336E21EDD3EB9E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Royal Mail group which became Post Office Limited was the prosecuting agency in this case, not the CPS. See Paragraph 4 of the court of appeal judgment (pdf) https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Hamilton-Others-v-Post-Office-judgment-230421.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwja-bi3lNaDAxV5XEEAHWS1Am0QFnoECCMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1ifJ3C4cDDvtjJJeShieog

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745553466674561335
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F6EA5A05F5EBFF9C0DE74AF9E105D4CA3AC220A8D75C567F336E21EDD3EB9E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1705048549740
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17455534666745613350F6EA5A05F5EBFF9C0DE74AF9E105D4CA3AC220A8D75C567F336E21EDD3EB9E5