Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 13:50:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 02353B9B7448651F43A35341AB3A2F3190E295E07F382516BBC8916F2668D7DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Court of Appeal judgment in Seema Misra’s appeal makes plain that she was prosecuted by the Post Office (then Royal Mail Group), not the CPS. See paragraph 4 of the linked judgement. https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2021/577.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745552952780062794
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 02353B9B7448651F43A35341AB3A2F3190E295E07F382516BBC8916F2668D7DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1705067412268
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174555295278006279402353B9B7448651F43A35341AB3A2F3190E295E07F382516BBC8916F2668D7DE