Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 01:10:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF1F5EAFDBED5930089B070C43E5580B9E67840281B4463F10DA9EE4A039E391
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- This proposed note suggests the data is out of date, but the article cited in the proposed note was published yesterday. The study was published just over 3 mos ago. Longitudinal studies take time to conduct & usually are based on data sets from a few years ago. https://bmjoncology.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000049.info

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745500974133993543
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF1F5EAFDBED5930089B070C43E5580B9E67840281B4463F10DA9EE4A039E391
  • createdAtMillis - 1705021831573
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745500974133993543BF1F5EAFDBED5930089B070C43E5580B9E67840281B4463F10DA9EE4A039E391