Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-11 23:53:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FCED27EDA95198A3F2E66B1D39D4E8D01D3842CDD79459CFF502BC6287C6E7CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

問題は国籍という部分だけで入居の可否を実質的に決めてしまうことです。 ですから、本人の年収、勤続年数、連帯保証人の内容などを総合的に加味した結果、入居を断るという判断になり、それがたまたま外国籍の人だったという場合も全て違法だと言っているわけではありません。 https://invest-online.jp/qanda/qanda-trouble-32-16916/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745439018576474404
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FCED27EDA95198A3F2E66B1D39D4E8D01D3842CDD79459CFF502BC6287C6E7CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1705017196166
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745439018576474404FCED27EDA95198A3F2E66B1D39D4E8D01D3842CDD79459CFF502BC6287C6E7CF