Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 01:26:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AA60E4CD9BF0E1C56B5718247FA36F4520FEF37ADB67CF683D3F433CD8561EFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

問題は国籍という部分だけで入居の可否を実質的に決めてしまうことです。 ですから、本人の年収、勤続年数、連帯保証人の内容などを総合的に加味した結果、入居を断るという判断になり、それがたまたま外国籍の人だったという場合も全て違法だと言っているわけではありません。 https://invest-online.jp/qanda/qanda-trouble-32-16916/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745439018576474404
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AA60E4CD9BF0E1C56B5718247FA36F4520FEF37ADB67CF683D3F433CD8561EFD
  • createdAtMillis - 1705022816047
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745439018576474404AA60E4CD9BF0E1C56B5718247FA36F4520FEF37ADB67CF683D3F433CD8561EFD