Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-11 18:47:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB7326878C9591A4F42F803E0C9752AFE5ABD72A9746EB8B5B45FC894EB1482F
Participant Details

Original Note:

While X might be a platform of high fidelity in a lot of cases, there has been cases of unnecessary suspension of some accounts with opposing voices. Also it is definitely not the "only" place to find the truth. This link has a summary of some notable suspensions https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_suspensions

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745341065115152882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB7326878C9591A4F42F803E0C9752AFE5ABD72A9746EB8B5B45FC894EB1482F
  • createdAtMillis - 1704998850752
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1745341065115152882AB7326878C9591A4F42F803E0C9752AFE5ABD72A9746EB8B5B45FC894EB1482F