Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-11 09:19:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5BED9C92DDC22794045DB8912800D384853F60E55BA9C355C6AEBFF650931DCA
Participant Details

Original Note:

While X might be a platform of high fidelity in a lot of cases, there has been cases of unnecessary suspension of some accounts with opposing voices. Also it is definitely not the "only" place to find the truth. This link has a summary of some notable suspensions https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_suspensions

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1745341065115152882
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5BED9C92DDC22794045DB8912800D384853F60E55BA9C355C6AEBFF650931DCA
createdAtMillis - 1704964754041
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17453410651151528825BED9C92DDC22794045DB8912800D384853F60E55BA9C355C6AEBFF650931DCA