Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-11 07:31:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 332695F2B0EB6E9AAF884BB669C2832AC3CDC2FBE1B503A485975E323A69440E
Participant Details

Original Note:

While X might be a platform of high fidelity in a lot of cases, there has been cases of unnecessary suspension of some accounts with opposing voices. Also it is definitely not the "only" place to find the truth. This link has a summary of some notable suspensions https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_suspensions

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745341065115152882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 332695F2B0EB6E9AAF884BB669C2832AC3CDC2FBE1B503A485975E323A69440E
  • createdAtMillis - 1704958316429
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1745341065115152882332695F2B0EB6E9AAF884BB669C2832AC3CDC2FBE1B503A485975E323A69440E