Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 15:10:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A30C2EC5A67DA72F0AC0E1A8CEBD8072A65EE67ABDE2437E0930554BB19E95B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN This isn’t misleading. The headline doesn’t suggest the full House voted to hold Hunter in contempt. Save this for the comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745247907769672082
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A30C2EC5A67DA72F0AC0E1A8CEBD8072A65EE67ABDE2437E0930554BB19E95B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1705072208319
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745247907769672082A30C2EC5A67DA72F0AC0E1A8CEBD8072A65EE67ABDE2437E0930554BB19E95B6