Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-11 00:57:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9EE38A3C151321686B5CBE2C490FCF9BD31AA8107D47ED55F5A4320E201C202
Participant Details

Original Note:

The main issue here is that, although Twitter/X does not owe an explanation, talking about free speech and exchange of ideas is quite in conflict with banning journalists and may warrant some explanations, especially since it was made clear that "free speech" was a major focus.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745199193352777865
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9EE38A3C151321686B5CBE2C490FCF9BD31AA8107D47ED55F5A4320E201C202
  • createdAtMillis - 1704934651191
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745199193352777865B9EE38A3C151321686B5CBE2C490FCF9BD31AA8107D47ED55F5A4320E201C202