Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-11 00:55:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8C1B5F2E33C3722ECC69924C7694CE19BED63DA4BEB13710B2451057ADB977E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The main issue here is that, although Twitter/X does not owe an explanation, talking about free speech and exchange of ideas is quite in conflict with banning journalists and may warrant some explanations, especially since it was made clear that "free speech" was a major focus.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745199193352777865
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8C1B5F2E33C3722ECC69924C7694CE19BED63DA4BEB13710B2451057ADB977E
  • createdAtMillis - 1704934529559
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745199193352777865B8C1B5F2E33C3722ECC69924C7694CE19BED63DA4BEB13710B2451057ADB977E