Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-11 00:54:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 68981F0DC7978EDF032A11DDC9C6CDFB242066DA58BC2ADEBCA2379EAF88CF5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The main issue here is that, although Twitter/X does not owe an explanation, talking about free speech and exchange of ideas is quite in conflict with banning journalists and may warrant some explanations, especially since it was made clear that "free speech" was a major focus.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745199193352777865
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 68981F0DC7978EDF032A11DDC9C6CDFB242066DA58BC2ADEBCA2379EAF88CF5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1704934460837
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174519919335277786568981F0DC7978EDF032A11DDC9C6CDFB242066DA58BC2ADEBCA2379EAF88CF5E