Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 18:31:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E1819010A68D01892EF6CB969542B71C64440DA272FA9D7592983E55FC4A49A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Meinungen zu der Thematik oder zu Correctiv in die Kommentare. Wenn "Correctiv" keine vertrauenswürdige Quelle ist, sind es die "Nachdenkseiten" übrigens schon drei Mal nicht. Schönen Abend an Alle.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745134699616301414
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E1819010A68D01892EF6CB969542B71C64440DA272FA9D7592983E55FC4A49A
  • createdAtMillis - 1704911460792
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17451346996163014148E1819010A68D01892EF6CB969542B71C64440DA272FA9D7592983E55FC4A49A