Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 17:30:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43CFBD9DECCF4A446EAE5D47518FFD1518CE323737690A7942A62ECB0851005C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Meinungen zu der Thematik oder zu Correctiv in die Kommentare. Wenn "Correctiv" keine vertrauenswürdige Quelle ist, sind es die "Nachdenkseiten" übrigens schon drei Mal nicht. Schönen Abend an Alle.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745134699616301414
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43CFBD9DECCF4A446EAE5D47518FFD1518CE323737690A7942A62ECB0851005C
  • createdAtMillis - 1704907829398
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174513469961630141443CFBD9DECCF4A446EAE5D47518FFD1518CE323737690A7942A62ECB0851005C