Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 23:58:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1062C1CF6DE86DDD217FAD9E2BB8DD66DE56993486F8A3344401D0B2D9292B53
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Meinungen zu der Thematik oder zu Correctiv in die Kommentare. Wenn "Correctiv" keine vertrauenswürdige Quelle ist, sind es die "Nachdenkseiten" übrigens schon drei Mal nicht. Schönen Abend an Alle.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745134699616301414
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1062C1CF6DE86DDD217FAD9E2BB8DD66DE56993486F8A3344401D0B2D9292B53
  • createdAtMillis - 1704931096722
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17451346996163014141062C1CF6DE86DDD217FAD9E2BB8DD66DE56993486F8A3344401D0B2D9292B53