Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-11 00:13:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CF275D2F260BC1F1BBB5C185FA66445B13232F513552F9B6845410216EEC5DC5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Quelle ist unzuverlässig. Bekanntermaßen ist correctiv.org keine unabhängige Faktenprüfstelle. Vor diesem Hintergrund sollte der Tweet differenziert betrachtet und kritisch hinterfragt werden. https://www.nachdenkseiten.de/?p=84691

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745132320011526216
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CF275D2F260BC1F1BBB5C185FA66445B13232F513552F9B6845410216EEC5DC5
  • createdAtMillis - 1704932031648
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745132320011526216CF275D2F260BC1F1BBB5C185FA66445B13232F513552F9B6845410216EEC5DC5