Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-11 05:39:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFDDE52B68E7125E4691EFB99AD2DE09082E85DD4EBD4D5E77DB0243684F0B3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

La afirmación del post es válida. Si bien no es emisión pura y se hace mediante ciertos “enjuagues financieros”, si es cierto que la emisión neta creció esa cantidad. Confirmacion de datos en Bloomberg: https://t.co/q4oC9zSmy2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745120855917547586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFDDE52B68E7125E4691EFB99AD2DE09082E85DD4EBD4D5E77DB0243684F0B3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1704951548162
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745120855917547586EFDDE52B68E7125E4691EFB99AD2DE09082E85DD4EBD4D5E77DB0243684F0B3F