Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-02 23:29:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E93A0C21A1CD3DD7C3A772E71A2DD0B6E79103B020A32F103E816535094229A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Lancet publication is not an « article », which would have to be peer-reviewed research, but a correspondence, i.e. a reader’s opinion that is not peer-reviewed. https://www.thelancet.com/what-we-publish

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745088538331238445
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E93A0C21A1CD3DD7C3A772E71A2DD0B6E79103B020A32F103E816535094229A
  • createdAtMillis - 1706916558176
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17450885383312384459E93A0C21A1CD3DD7C3A772E71A2DD0B6E79103B020A32F103E816535094229A