Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 17:33:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8DE4627C5509098DB53EB2479C65A3C5ECA428160811A6AF3C3B707D0ED3249B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Het genoemde onderzoek is een meta-analyse, geen inhoudelijk onderzoek. In het artikel concluderen de onderzoekers zelf dat ze onzin verkondigen "our estimates are limited by their imprecision". Deze cijfers extrapoleren naar NL is dan eveneens onzin. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745047677295816704
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8DE4627C5509098DB53EB2479C65A3C5ECA428160811A6AF3C3B707D0ED3249B
  • createdAtMillis - 1704907996682
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17450476772958167048DE4627C5509098DB53EB2479C65A3C5ECA428160811A6AF3C3B707D0ED3249B