Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 11:12:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 12BADC3BDC53002C2C545413C78075493A1965F624E503027CD7763ED898FAFE
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post is a false representation of data. Rating couldn't be performed in the UK on 70% on sites because of COVID restrictions. Taking the complete results of the 2019 survey, 70% of bathing waters were rated excellent and 90% rated excellent or good. https://discomap.eea.europa.eu/bathingwaterstory/ https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-bathing-water-quality-in-2019

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745010205178356054
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 12BADC3BDC53002C2C545413C78075493A1965F624E503027CD7763ED898FAFE
  • createdAtMillis - 1704885145453
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174501020517835605412BADC3BDC53002C2C545413C78075493A1965F624E503027CD7763ED898FAFE