Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 07:10:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A11A79FB953F7392A8A17DB75DFC4EB7F87291C150F56F74CDCC27C403E1E372
Participant Details

Original Note:

投稿主が指摘している「被災地には47億円」はあくまで緊急支援として行われたプッシュ型支援の財源であることに留意が必要です。 以後の震災対応も予備費4,600億円が使用され、かつ新年度予算案では予備費を倍の1兆円に積み増されるとの報道もされています。 https://jp.reuters.com/economy/ON4H44SXEFLZTB54IRCBZCCUJI-2024-01-09/ https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASS1974N4S19UTFK015.html https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/b6ecbfca1a06582247840470b40b57110a7f11f0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744889919997358405
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A11A79FB953F7392A8A17DB75DFC4EB7F87291C150F56F74CDCC27C403E1E372
  • createdAtMillis - 1704870617492
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744889919997358405A11A79FB953F7392A8A17DB75DFC4EB7F87291C150F56F74CDCC27C403E1E372