Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 11:55:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E05C6ABBC7B4F6586EF87ECD2332BC01624781FCA3B2A4DAA5E51F852D6EB943
Participant Details

Original Note:

MIT's handbook does not have to list all of the sources one cannot plagiarise, including Wikipedia. Copying any text without attribution was plagiarism. Wikipedia's 2009 terms also say their text can only be re-used if attribution to Wikipedia is made with a URL to the page: https://web.archive.org/web/20091207164000/http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1744841137494593947
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E05C6ABBC7B4F6586EF87ECD2332BC01624781FCA3B2A4DAA5E51F852D6EB943
createdAtMillis - 1704887751693
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1744841137494593947E05C6ABBC7B4F6586EF87ECD2332BC01624781FCA3B2A4DAA5E51F852D6EB943