Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 06:47:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD0D7EB4F3DF0070224C7BC4C63B2F7E9B5B760A59E4C41EF0DEC936A450CD8A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Mr. Ackman refers to and disputes the second article. He states that his wife is not guilty of plagiarism clearly taking into account the second article. Thus the proposed community note is inaccurate. Source: Mr. Ackman’s detailed post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744838616965062801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD0D7EB4F3DF0070224C7BC4C63B2F7E9B5B760A59E4C41EF0DEC936A450CD8A
  • createdAtMillis - 1704869260353
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744838616965062801DD0D7EB4F3DF0070224C7BC4C63B2F7E9B5B760A59E4C41EF0DEC936A450CD8A