Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 22:47:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3A0CC2DDC6120C5600DB6C1433CCF229F5B0C350C283288BD4F56CA48B1C2083
Participant Details

Original Note:

Mr. Ackman refers to and disputes the second article. He states that his wife is not guilty of plagiarism clearly taking into account the second article. Thus the proposed community note is inaccurate. Source: Mr. Ackman’s detailed post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744838616965062801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3A0CC2DDC6120C5600DB6C1433CCF229F5B0C350C283288BD4F56CA48B1C2083
  • createdAtMillis - 1704926844904
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17448386169650628013A0CC2DDC6120C5600DB6C1433CCF229F5B0C350C283288BD4F56CA48B1C2083