Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 00:07:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3A0258DDA04F7598F228EB99FDCDC49976464A9F1E48FC72CA2242573E288701
Participant Details

Original Note:

Mr. Ackman refers to and disputes the second article. He states that his wife is not guilty of plagiarism clearly taking into account the second article. Thus the proposed community note is inaccurate. Source: Mr. Ackman’s detailed post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744838616965062801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3A0258DDA04F7598F228EB99FDCDC49976464A9F1E48FC72CA2242573E288701
  • createdAtMillis - 1704845270410
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17448386169650628013A0258DDA04F7598F228EB99FDCDC49976464A9F1E48FC72CA2242573E288701