Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 09:47:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07CEACFA798CFDE894F6EDE20942D3B59A1252AE856267F240DA202677EEE66D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. Ackman states that Neri Oxman’s statement didn’t admit she plagiarised. However, he neglects to mention that her statement was released before a second report, which found she copied and pasted entire sections of Wikipedia and other scholars without attribution https://www.businessinsider.com/neri-oxman-plagiarize-wikipedia-mit-dissertation-2024-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1744822957078388935
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 07CEACFA798CFDE894F6EDE20942D3B59A1252AE856267F240DA202677EEE66D
createdAtMillis - 1704880024263
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 174482295707838893507CEACFA798CFDE894F6EDE20942D3B59A1252AE856267F240DA202677EEE66D