Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 19:31:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 74FBBD24C4829D574AC2E7A6D334D569BA9F528DE5E080D4BE7E8F6B76286297
Participant Details

Original Note:

Trump's lawyer was responding to a hypothetical asked by the judge, not "arguing" for the act of assassination. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/01/09/appeals_court_judge_asks_trump_attorney_would_a_president_be_criminally_liable_for_ordering_seal_team_six_to_assassinate_a_political_rival.html Asked if impeachment must precede criminal prosecution, Trump's lawyer merely gave a "qualified yes" that impeachment must come first. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744799113542017282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 74FBBD24C4829D574AC2E7A6D334D569BA9F528DE5E080D4BE7E8F6B76286297
  • createdAtMillis - 1704828683307
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174479911354201728274FBBD24C4829D574AC2E7A6D334D569BA9F528DE5E080D4BE7E8F6B76286297