Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 05:25:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF39F1F380EEF6400EB4F0D081C2BA37F83B73867934803231604ED37A79F40E
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the example may be hypothetical, the precedent the defence is trying to establish is that the President enjoys absolute immunity. This example would hold true if they are awarded victory.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744798083374796998
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF39F1F380EEF6400EB4F0D081C2BA37F83B73867934803231604ED37A79F40E
  • createdAtMillis - 1704864342528
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744798083374796998FF39F1F380EEF6400EB4F0D081C2BA37F83B73867934803231604ED37A79F40E