Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 03:55:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B00B1AD50691CA4F4D8CC0925637D5F55AF66D3299E765E3AE95D9140EB67DC0
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the example may be hypothetical, the precedent the defence is trying to establish is that the President enjoys absolute immunity. This example would hold true if they are awarded victory.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744798083374796998
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B00B1AD50691CA4F4D8CC0925637D5F55AF66D3299E765E3AE95D9140EB67DC0
  • createdAtMillis - 1704858919524
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744798083374796998B00B1AD50691CA4F4D8CC0925637D5F55AF66D3299E765E3AE95D9140EB67DC0