Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 18:36:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C47A0D23DB9821E30991814B942D3E1551BE28303FEE08D55DB647726B3A6E21
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community notes are not being written by the Labour party, instead by community notes contributors who are selected to have different points of view. Factually incorrect or biased notes can be rated as unhelpful and are less likely to be shown. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/signing-up https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/notes-on-twitter

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1744764375880110450
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C47A0D23DB9821E30991814B942D3E1551BE28303FEE08D55DB647726B3A6E21
createdAtMillis - 1704825403945
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1744764375880110450C47A0D23DB9821E30991814B942D3E1551BE28303FEE08D55DB647726B3A6E21