Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 18:02:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58780E5860B474D523ED02D6387B9BA4FF4CF5AFEAFF856EB698648A6B24F759
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community notes are not being written by the Labour party, instead by community notes contributors who are selected to have different points of view. Factually incorrect or biased notes can be rated as unhelpful and are less likely to be shown. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/signing-up https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/notes-on-twitter

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1744764375880110450
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 58780E5860B474D523ED02D6387B9BA4FF4CF5AFEAFF856EB698648A6B24F759
createdAtMillis - 1704823369241
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 174476437588011045058780E5860B474D523ED02D6387B9BA4FF4CF5AFEAFF856EB698648A6B24F759