Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 12:44:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28F48368D4900669948BB2A39F174C5D5A7DF39E5639CD4EB2DD793065DFBE8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community notes are not being written by the Labour party, instead by community notes contributors who are selected to have different points of view. Factually incorrect or biased notes can be rated as unhelpful and are less likely to be shown. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/signing-up https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/notes-on-twitter

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1744764375880110450
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 28F48368D4900669948BB2A39F174C5D5A7DF39E5639CD4EB2DD793065DFBE8F
createdAtMillis - 1704890654066
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 174476437588011045028F48368D4900669948BB2A39F174C5D5A7DF39E5639CD4EB2DD793065DFBE8F