Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 01:56:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10C584EF6BA149C21CE4C90ADEF3C8626548226DA950AB9643490EF6A70E3D20
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community notes are not being written by the Labour party, instead by community notes contributors who are selected to have different points of view. Factually incorrect or biased notes can be rated as unhelpful and are less likely to be shown. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/signing-up https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/notes-on-twitter

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1744764375880110450
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 10C584EF6BA149C21CE4C90ADEF3C8626548226DA950AB9643490EF6A70E3D20
createdAtMillis - 1704851807931
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 174476437588011045010C584EF6BA149C21CE4C90ADEF3C8626548226DA950AB9643490EF6A70E3D20