Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-10 08:33:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E0EFFDED6534EFC35DCB87093C15D465BFD20A2B83650C0E64EB28B245597D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community notes are not being written by the Labour party, instead by community notes contributors who are selected to have different points of view. Factually incorrect or biased notes can be rated as unhelpful and are less likely to be shown. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/signing-up https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/notes-on-twitter

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1744764375880110450
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0E0EFFDED6534EFC35DCB87093C15D465BFD20A2B83650C0E64EB28B245597D9
createdAtMillis - 1704875593253
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17447643758801104500E0EFFDED6534EFC35DCB87093C15D465BFD20A2B83650C0E64EB28B245597D9