Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 15:59:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CB5B273B70410F750562ED46795E87F0289CA3D4DF3E30CA6803747B5A329EC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

O tema é um debate em andamento nas ciências criminais e não há, ainda, uma verdade absoluta sobre isso. O editor tenta fazer prevalecer sua posição utilizando-se apenas de evidências anedóticas. Exemplo de artigo científico sobre os benefícios do instituto: https://revistaowl.com.br/index.php/owl/article/view/68

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744696500427346012
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CB5B273B70410F750562ED46795E87F0289CA3D4DF3E30CA6803747B5A329EC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1704815940978
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744696500427346012CB5B273B70410F750562ED46795E87F0289CA3D4DF3E30CA6803747B5A329EC9