Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 23:11:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C27958C2B7DC049F8C5D346988600A022F1BA0A6B457096DE2316B1F1BC8C99
Participant Details

Original Note:

O tema é um debate em andamento nas ciências criminais e não há, ainda, uma verdade absoluta sobre isso. O editor tenta fazer prevalecer sua posição utilizando-se apenas de evidências anedóticas. Exemplo de artigo científico sobre os benefícios do instituto: https://revistaowl.com.br/index.php/owl/article/view/68

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744696500427346012
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C27958C2B7DC049F8C5D346988600A022F1BA0A6B457096DE2316B1F1BC8C99
  • createdAtMillis - 1704841904012
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17446965004273460128C27958C2B7DC049F8C5D346988600A022F1BA0A6B457096DE2316B1F1BC8C99