Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 14:49:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45718859AE771D2ACDD2C238C1052AAC426E799079E67A05B1E28487EC509EBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

O tema é um debate em andamento nas ciências criminais e não há, ainda, uma verdade absoluta sobre isso. O editor tenta fazer prevalecer sua posição utilizando-se apenas de evidências anedóticas. Exemplo de artigo científico sobre os benefícios do instituto: https://revistaowl.com.br/index.php/owl/article/view/68

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744696500427346012
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45718859AE771D2ACDD2C238C1052AAC426E799079E67A05B1E28487EC509EBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1704811787913
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174469650042734601245718859AE771D2ACDD2C238C1052AAC426E799079E67A05B1E28487EC509EBE