Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 15:25:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C818901FAF1FB802E7B588D62CFF8FE90A9E0939B7C7638F28628C815A2E800F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court was not given any proof of the existence of any tapes, and the allegations were retracted by Ransome soon after they were initially made. These are only allegations and the post is presenting them as a fact. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/08/epstein-sex-tapes-prince-andrew-bill-clinton-richard-branson-witness-claimed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744645009465319667
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C818901FAF1FB802E7B588D62CFF8FE90A9E0939B7C7638F28628C815A2E800F
  • createdAtMillis - 1704813901725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744645009465319667C818901FAF1FB802E7B588D62CFF8FE90A9E0939B7C7638F28628C815A2E800F