Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 16:53:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C5F97791AE221A7353F9E94C5D6AB5F466BCCE7DF56D97C0D3E578D5AA0379DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court was not given any proof of the existence of any tapes, and the allegations were retracted by Ransome soon after they were initially made. These are only allegations and the post is presenting them as a fact. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/08/epstein-sex-tapes-prince-andrew-bill-clinton-richard-branson-witness-claimed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1744645009465319667
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C5F97791AE221A7353F9E94C5D6AB5F466BCCE7DF56D97C0D3E578D5AA0379DD
createdAtMillis - 1704819197216
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1744645009465319667C5F97791AE221A7353F9E94C5D6AB5F466BCCE7DF56D97C0D3E578D5AA0379DD